NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Langelaar v R (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 228 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 25 September 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Campbell J N Adams J Decision: The application for leave to set aside or vary the orders made on 22 July 2016 is refused. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – application under r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules – held applicant seeking to re-argue arguments previously considered and re-argue the case – held applicant has not demonstrated misapprehension as to facts or law Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application of Malcolm Potier (No 3) [2015] NSWCCA 306 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Bruce Edward Gall v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 152 Burrell v The Queen (2008) 238 CLR 218; [2008] HCA 34 Gately v the Queen (2007) 232 CLR 208; [2007] HCA 55. Kees Langelaar v R [2016] NSWCCA 143 Miller v R (No 2) [2016] NSWCCA 158 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council and Others (1982) 149 CLR 672; [1982] HCA 41 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kees Cornelius Langelaar (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate