NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika [2017] NSWSC 1275 Hearing dates: 2, 7 June 2017 Date of orders: 07 June 2017 Decision date: 07 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Application under s 132(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 granted; (2) Trial to be conducted by Judge alone; (3) Application for separation of the trials of each accused refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – application for separate trials – application for judge alone trial – if judge alone, no need for separate trials – not in interests of witness or justice for separate trials – intertwining of evidence – evidence admissible only against some accused but its content of extremely high probative value – unlikely directions overcome unfair prejudice – reasonable apprehension of unfairness to accused – principles for application – in interests of justice for judge alone trial – orders made. Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986, Ss 131, 132, 132A Supreme Court Rules 1970, Part 75, Rule 3H Cases Cited: Arthurs v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASC 182 Barber v R; Zraika v R [2016] NSWCCA 125 Demirok v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 20; (1977) HCA 21 R v Adams (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1359 R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Colin Maxwell Farrow [2014 NSWSC 1781 R v Dean [2013] NSWSC 661 R v Gittany [2013] NSWSC 1503 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 259 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 The Queen v Glennon (1992) 193 CLR 592; [1992] HCA 16 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2014/00180060: Regina (Crown) Louise Catherine SPITERI-AHERN (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate