NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1277 Hearing dates: 31 August 2017 Date of orders: 31 August 2017 Decision date: 31 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Issue of the subpoena allowed; (2) Documents produced as a result of the subject subpoena to be returned to the Court and, pursuant to the terms of s 299B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, after which the Court will determine whether the documents fall within the category of a protected confidence, and if so, appropriate notice will be given to the witness and the other parties. Catchwords: SUBPOENA – suggestion that documents sought caught by privilege created for communication in confidence of victim of sexual assault – Court not aware of circumstance of person's history, nor nature of documents – subpoena issued for purpose of determining preliminary issue of whether privilege under s 295 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 applied. Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986, Part 5, Division 2, ss 295, 296, 299B, 299C Category: Procedural rulings Parties: 2014/00180060: Regina (Crown) Louise Catherine SPITERI-AHERN (Accused)
2014/00180279: Regina (Crown) April BARBER (Accused)
2014/00235123: Regina (Crown) Amin ZRAIKA (Accused) Representation: Counsel: 2014/00180060: D Patch (Crown) J Trevallion (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate