NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika (No 5) [2017] NSWSC 1279 Hearing dates: 6 September 2017 Date of orders: 06 September 2017 Decision date: 06 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: Pursuant to the terms of s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995, limit the use that may be made of the evidence adduced in re-examination, for which leave has already been granted, to that which goes to credit pursuant to the terms of s 108 of the Evidence Act 1995. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – documents tendered – documents are Statements to Police by witness – sought to be adduced in re-examination – purpose is to re-establish credit – s 108 of the Evidence Act 1995 – Crown desires that it be used as evidence of the fact asserted – unfair and prejudicial in circumstances that adduced in re-examination – order to limit rise to credit. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 32, 38, 39, 108, 136, 192 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: 2014/00180060: Regina (Crown) Louise Catherine SPITERI-AHERN (Accused)
2014/00180279: Regina (Crown) April BARBER (Accused)
2014/00235123: Regina (Crown) Amin ZRAIKA (Accused) Representation: Counsel: 2014/00180060: D Patch (Crown) J Trevallion (Accused)
2014/00180279: D Patch (Crown) A Francis (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate