NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika (No 6) [2017] NSWSC 1280 Hearing dates: 11 September 2017 Date of orders: 11 September 2017 Decision date: 11 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Leave under s 32 and/or s 38 of the Evidence Act 1995 refused; (2) To the extent necessary, leave under s 39(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 granted. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – application to cross-examine by Crown in re-examination under s 38 of the Evidence Act 1995 – whether matter arises – leave under s 39(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 granted but not to cross-examine. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 32, 38, 39 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: 2014/00180060: Regina (Crown) Louise Catherine SPITERI-AHERN (Accused)
2014/00180279: Regina (Crown) April BARBER (Accused)
2014/00235123: Regina (Crown) Amin ZRAIKA (Accused) Representation: Counsel: 2014/00180060: D Patch (Crown) J Trevallion (Accused)
2014/00180279: D Patch (Crown) A Francis (Accused)
2014/00235123: D Patch (Crown) Dr R Webb (Accused)
Solicitors: 2014/00180060: Office of the Director Public Prosecutions (Crown) Archbold Legal Solutions (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate