NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tyler Fenton v R; Marc Douglas O'Neill v R; Jyles Cousinsv R; Matthew Lolicato v R [2017] NSWDC 265 Hearing dates: 28 July, 8 September 2017 Date of orders: 22 September 2017 Decision date: 22 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: 1 The application for a certificate is refused. Catchwords: COSTS – defence costs following Nolle Prosequi PRINCIPLES – criteria – standard – onus – finding of fact CRIMINAL LAW – aggravated sexual intercourse without consent Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 ss.2, 3, 3(1)(b) Crimes Act 1900 s.61HA(4) Cases Cited: Cox v R [2017] NSWCCA 129 Category: Costs Parties: Tyler Fenton v R (Applicant) Marc Douglas O'Neill (Applicant) Jyles Cousins (Applicant) Matthew Lolicato (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Haverfield (Applicants) Mr T McCarthy (Respondent, 28 July 2017) Mr G Tabuteau (Respondent, 8 September 2017)
Solicitors: Thexton Lawyers (Applicant Cousins) CB Legal (Applicant Lolicato) Nicholas WJ Rolfe & Associates (Applicants Fenton and O'Neill) C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/00206047(Fenton)2014/00206049 (O'Neill)2014/00206051 (cousins)2014/00206774 (Lolicato) Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate