NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boldi v Crozier [2015] NSWSC 2155 Hearing dates: 7 December 2015 Date of orders: 07 December 2015 Decision date: 07 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Brereton J Decision: Orders made joining applicant to proceedings. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – application for joinder of beneficiary to proceedings – Court's general disinclination to join beneficiaries to proceedings – circumstances in which joinder warranted – greater likelihood of joinder where beneficiary receives substantial benefits likely to be disturbed by family provision order – whether applicant justified in having lost confidence in executor's conduct of proceedings – where joinder would be at applicant's own risk as to costs. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 Cases Cited: Frangos v Frangos (Victorian Court of Appeal, 7 July 1995, unreported) Re Burton (deceased) [1958] QWN 27 Re Klease [1972] QWN 44 Vasiljev v Public Trustee [1974] 2 NSWLR 497 Will of Lanfear [1940] 57 WN (NSW) 181 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Luciana Iole Boldi (plaintiff) Terence Crozier (first defendant) Melanie Aliberti (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Bloont (applicant/second defendant) P Thew (plaintiff) R Tidswell (respondent/first defendant)
Solicitors: Anderson Lawyers (plaintiff) Caroll & O'Dea Lawyers (respondent/first defendant) Palmers Solicitors (applicant/second defendant) File Number(s): 2015/132953
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate