NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Malek v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 124 Hearing dates: 19 September 2017 Date of orders: 26 September 2017 Decision date: 26 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Molesworth AJ Decision: See orders at [49] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to adduce expert architectural evidence – whether decision of Registrar precludes application – whether Applicant restricted to seeking review of Registrar's decision – whether expert architectural evidence reasonably required – whether Court should exercise discretion to allow expert architectural evidence Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56, 61 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 96, 97AA Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 38 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 31.17, 31.19, 31.20, 31.24, 49.16, 49.18, 49.19, 49.20; Division 2 of Part 31, Division 4 of Part 49 Cases Cited: Groeneveld v Wollongong City Council (2009) 168 LGERA 260; [2009] NSWLEC 149 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Willoughby City Council v Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 238 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ms Michelle Malek (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C R Ireland (Applicant) Mr M A Cottom (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Addisons (Applicant) HWL Ebsworth (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00210663
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate