NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232 Hearing dates: 6 September 2017 Decision date: 27 September 2017 Before: Payne JA at [1] McCallum J at [20] Wilson J at [65] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – Crown appeal – dangerous driving causing death and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm – fatigue – whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of moral culpability – whether sentence manifestly inadequate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 52A(1)(c), 52A(3)(c) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 5, 7, 53A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Cases Cited: Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13 CMB v The Attorney-General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Begbie [2001] NSWCCA 206; (2001) 124 A Crim R 300 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R 451; [2002] NSWCCA 489 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288 R v Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32 R v Merillo [2017] NSWCCA 173 R v Paul Musumeci (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 30 October 1997, unrep) R v Whelan [2012] NSWCCA 147 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Silvestri v R [2016] NSWCCA 245 Taylor v R [2006] NSWCCA 7 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (applicant)) Muhammad Al-Hafiz Manok (respondent) Representation: Counsel: B K Baker (Crown applicant) G Smith SC (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate