NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Henderson bhnf Sullivan v State of Queensland [2017] NSWSC 1313 Hearing dates: 25 September 2017 Decision date: 25 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Dismiss the notice of motion filed on 19 June 2017.
2. Order that the costs of the notice of motion be costs in the cause. Catchwords: CROSS-VESTING – defendant's application for transfer to Supreme Court of Queensland – interests of justice – proper law of tort is Queensland law – potential witnesses in Queensland and northern NSW – plaintiff's solicitors in Sydney and expert witnesses in Sydney – possibility of Court sitting in Lismore to take evidence – order for transfer refused Legislation Cited: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW), s 5 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Jane Henderson bhnf Ronald Sullivan (Plaintiff) State of Queensland (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Burke (Defendant/Applicant) A Campbell (Plaintiff/Respondent)
Solicitors: Gerard Francis Malouf (Plaintiff) Minter Ellison (Defendant) File Number(s): 2017/88874
Judgment: EX TEMPORE
Introduction 1. By notice of motion filed on 19 June 2017, the State of Queensland (the applicant/defendant) in seeks an order that this Court transfer these proceedings pursuant to s 5(2) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) to the Supreme Court of Queensland. The plaintiff/respondent resists the notice of motion.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate