NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: So v Council of the City of Sydney [2017] NSWLEC 128 Hearing dates: 19 September 2017 Date of orders: 20 September 2017 Decision date: 20 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: 1 The appeal is dismissed; 2 Development application D/2016/1846 for consent to internal fitout, external alterations to and use of premises at 8 Cunningham Street in the City of Sydney as "sex services premises (brothel)" is determined by refusal; and 3 The exhibits, other than Exhibits C, E, G and 2, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – application for sex services premises (brothel) – proposed development is permissible – the proposed development is non-compliant with provisions of the development control plan – another brothel separated from premises by 45 m – proposed development breaches anti-clustering requirement of DCP – proposed development opposite residential premises contrary to requirement of DCP – safe access for mobility disadvantaged persons not able to be provided without works in public roadway – no Roads Act consent for such works – safe access for mobility disadvantaged persons not able to be provided without works on properties not in the ownership or control of the Applicant – no owner's consent for such works – development refused consent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 79C(3A) City of Sydney Development Control Plan, ss 1, 4 and 4.4.6.1 Roads Act 1993 Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.3, 7.21 Cases Cited: Botany Bay City Council v Premier Customs Services Pty Ltd (2009) 172 LGERA 338; [2009] NSWCA 226 Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 New Century Developments Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2003) 127 LGERA 303; [2003] NSWLEC 154 Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472 Yao v Liverpool City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1167 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael So (Applicant) Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Campbell, solicitor (Applicant) Ms M Carpenter, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate