NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ikimdzhieva t/as C & L Upholstery Services v Fudala [2017] NSWCATAP 196 Hearing dates: 04 September 2017 Date of orders: 29 September 2017 Decision date: 29 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member F Corsaro SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – denial of procedural fairness - bias - New evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Fair Trading Act 1987 Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Al-Daouk v Mr Pine Pty Ltd t/as Furnco Bankstown [2015] NSWCATAP 111 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70; [1990] HCA 31 Leisure Brothers Pty Ltd v Smith [2017] NSWCATAP 11 Michael Wilson & Partners v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Owners - SP 76269 v Draybi Bros Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 29 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed) 2017 Thomson Reuters Category: Principal judgment Parties: Diana Ikimdzhieva t/as C & L Upholstery Services (Appellant) Sofia Fudala (Respondent) Representation: C Tsakmakis (Appellant) Self-represented (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 17/27047 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 26 May 2017 Before: J Ringrose, General Member File Number(s): GEN 16/52681
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate