NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of NSW v Clarke [2017] NSWCATOD 142 Hearing dates: 24, 25 August 2017, 31 August, 14 September and 22 September 2017(submissions) Date of orders: 04 October 2017 Decision date: 04 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: F Marks ADCJ, Principal Member L Pearson, Principal Member J Schwager, Member Decision: 1.Application for permanent stay dismissed 2.Costs are reserved with liberty to apply which must be exercised within one month 3.Matter listed for directions on 1 November 2017 at 9.30am Catchwords: Legal practitioner-delay in prosecution of complaint of professional misconduct did not constitute an abuse of process-application for permanent stay refused Abuse of process-held Civil and Administrative Tribunal has specific and implied powers to order permanent stay of proceedings Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act Cases Cited: Licul v Corney (1975) 180 CLR 213 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 35 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) HCA 20, (1980 – 1981) 147 CLR 246 Re Luck [2003] HCA 70 Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission [2007] FCAFC 183 Macatangay v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 272 Bracks v Smyth-Kirk [2009] NSWCA 401 Leybourne v Habkouk [2012] NSWCA 212 Kermani v Westpac Banking Corporation (2012) 36 VR 130 Strong v the Law Society of NSW [2001] NSWCA 311 Director of Public Prosecutions v Shirvanian (1998) 45 NSWLR 129 BTH v The Public Guardian [2017] NSWCATAP 10 Jago v The District Court of NSW and Others [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23 Carson v Legal Services Commissioner & Anor [2000] NSWCA 308 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of NSW (Applicant) Daniel Christopher Clarke (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Stitt QC (Applicant) K Williams SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate