NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Spiteri-Ahern; R v Barber; R v Zraika (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 1329 Hearing dates: 26 September 2017 Date of orders: 26 September 2017 Decision date: 26 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: The Court rejects the evidence sought to be adduced by the Crown on the grounds that its only relevance or its overwhelming relevance is unfairly prejudicial. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – guilt by association – probative value – unfairly prejudicial effect – evidence rejected Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 55, 135, 137 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: 2014/00180060: Regina (Crown) Louise Catherine SPITERI-AHERN (Accused)
2014/00180279: Regina (Crown) April BARBER (Accused)
2014/00235123: Regina (Crown) Amin ZRAIKA (Accused) Representation: Counsel: 2014/00180060: D Patch (Crown) J Trevallion (Accused)
2014/00180279: D Patch (Crown) A Francis (Accused)
2014/00235123: D Patch (Crown) Dr R Webb (Accused)
Solicitors: 2014/00180060: Office of the Director Public Prosecutions (Crown) Archbold Legal Solutions (Accused)
2014/00180279: Office of the Director Public Prosecutions (Crown) Bannisters Lawyers (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate