NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hong v R [2017] NSWCCA 238 Hearing dates: 11 September 2017 Date of orders: 09 October 2017 Decision date: 09 October 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Beech-Jones J at [2]; Fagan J at [44] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted.
(2) Appeal allowed in part.
(3) Vary the sentence imposed for sequence 2 on the indictment so that the sentence for that offence is to commence on 2 June 2017 and expire on 1 March 2020 with the non-parole period to expire on 1 December 2018.
(4) The appeal be otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – application by offender for leave to appeal – child pornography offences – whether sentence unreasonable or plainly unjust – applicant's criminality around the mid-range level of seriousness – early plea demonstrated genuine remorse – Court could not confidently find that there was a low risk of re-offending –hardship suffered by the applicant's family taken into account – whether sentence was outside the appropriate range for the criminality of the offence – whether the sentence reflected the applicant's subjective case – comparable cases or statistics do not support a conclusion that the applicant's sentence was manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91H Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 70 Criminal Code (Cth), s 474.19 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 500, 501 Sex Offender Registration Act 2004 (Vic) Cases Cited: Dennis v The Queen [2017] VSCA 251 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Pratten (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 42 Fitzgerald v R [2015] NSWCCA 266 James v R [2009] NSWCCA 62 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Miao v R [2017] NSWCCA 89 Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Martin; 246 A Crim R 477; [2014] NSWCCA 283 R v Porte 252 A Crim R 294; [2015] NSWCCA 174 R v Zerafa 235 A Crim R 265; [2013] NSWCCA 222 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Aun Hsiung Hong (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) D Barrow (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate