NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: John Edward Thornton v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 248 Hearing dates: 20 September 2017 Decision date: 06 October 2017 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [41]; Fagan J at [42]. Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Appellant pay respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – battery – assault – where police used significant force in arresting plaintiff – where arrest said to be wrongful at common law and under Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) – whether primary judge erred in preferring police evidence over contrary evidence of plaintiff – whether primary judge erred by failing to provide adequate reasons for preferring police evidence – whether primary judge erred in finding that police officers identified themselves as police and that communicating required information was otherwise impracticable Legislation Cited: Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), ss 201, 230, 231 Cases Cited: Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Krivoshev v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [2005] NSWCA 76 Kuru v State of New South Wales (2008) 236 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 26 Monie v Commonwealth (2005) 63 NSWLR 729; [2005] NSWCA 25 Poidevin v Semaan (2013) 85 NSWLR 758; [2013] NSWCA 334 State of New South Wales v McCarthy [2015] NSWCA 153 Woodley v Boyd [2001] NSWCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Edward Thornton (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) State of New South Wales (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel: A Moutasallem (Appellant/Cross-Respondent) J E Maconachie QC with M S Spartalis (Respondent/Cross-Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate