NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dungog Shire Council v Hunter Industrial Rental Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 153 Hearing dates: 13-17, 20-24, 27-28 February 2017; 1- 3, 24, 28, 30-31 March 2017; and 12-13, 20 April 2017 Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Molesworth AJ Decision: See orders at [895] of judgment Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT – carrying out development contrary to development consent – construction of development consent – whether development application and environmental impact statement incorporated into the development consent – held that there was uncertainty or ambiguity on the face of the consent and that therefore there was incorporation by necessary implication
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT – carrying out development contrary to conditions of consent – whether conditions validly imposed on development of quarry – whether quarrying restricted to confined area – whether quarrying on lot 6 permissible under development consent – development consent did not contemplate quarrying on lot 6, but merely ancillary activities – regard had to plan accompanying environmental impact statement
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT – carrying out development contrary to conditions of consent – whether approval granted at genus level "extractive industry", or at species level "quarry for railway ballast" – approval was for railway ballast quarry – appropriate to characterise at species level because of external impact – elements of a railway ballast quarry as distinct from a generic quarry are: 1. production of crushed rock of a particular range of grades for railway usage; 2. utilisation of railway rolling stock for transporting the rock; 3. usually loaded from a railway siding purpose-built within or adjoining the ballast quarry; 4. usually a railway freight car carries the ballast to its end location; and 5. contained amenity and environmental impact – operations have transformed and are no longer a railway ballast quarry – connectivity between purpose, product, mode of operation and consequential external environmental impact distinguishes a railway ballast quarry from a more generic quarry – transformation from railway ballast quarry to general quarry did not have planning approval
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate