NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Northern Sydney Local Health District v Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up) [2017] NSWCA 251 Hearing dates: 22 September 2017 Date of orders: 22 September 2017 Decision date: 10 October 2017 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Basten JA at [41]; Sackville AJA at [84] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed.
(2) Order that the Appellants pay the costs of the first respondent.
(3) No order as to the costs of the second respondent. Catchwords: DUST DISEASES – damages – apportionment between joint tortfeasors – Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5 – injured worker previously received statutory workers' compensation payment – insurer entitled to first charge on recovered damages under Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld), s 207B – whether primary tortfeasor entitled to recover contributions from joint tortfeasors in circumstances where insurer entered into agreement with injured worker to pay worker 20% of amount recovered from primary tortfeasor
WORDS AND PHRASES – "double compensation" – whether agreement between injured worker and insurer whereby insurer pays worker 20% of damages recovered from tortfeasor constitutes double compensation in circumstances where worker had received statutory compensation payment
WORKERS COMPENSATION – whether agreement that insurer pay worker 20% of recovered damages valid in circumstances where worker had received statutory compensation payment – whether insurer permitted to waive its right to enforce statutory charge on recovered damages under Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld), s 207B Legislation Cited: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), s 32 Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2013 (NSW), Pt 4, Div 5 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5 Workers Compensation Act 1926 (NSW), s 16 Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld), ss 128E, 207A, 207B; Ch 3A Cases Cited: Adams v Ascot Iron Foundry Pty Ltd (1968) 72 SR (NSW) 120 Batchelor v Burke (1981) 148 CLR 448; [1981] HCA 30 Baxter v Obacelo Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 635; [2001] HCA 66 Bitumen & Oil Refineries (Australia) Ltd v Commissioner for Government Transport (1955) 92 CLR 200; [1955] HCA 1 Boncristiano v Lohmann [1998] 4 VR 82 Dionisatos v Acrow Formwork & Scaffolding Pty Ltd (2015) 91 NSWLR 34; [2015] NSWCA 281 Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60; [1991] HCA 15 Jameson v Central Electricity Generating Board [1998] QB 323 Jameson v Central Electricity Generating Board [2000] 1 AC 455 Manser v Spry (1994) 181 CLR 428; [1994] HCA 50 National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd v Espagne (1961) 105 CLR 569; [1961] HCA 15 Parry v Cleaver [1970] AC 1 Redding v Lee (1983) 151 CLR 117; [1983] HCA 16 SAS Trustee Corp v Budd [2005] NSWCA 366; (2005) 3 DDCR 382 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd v Lindley [2010] NSWCA 357 United Airlines Inc v Sercel Australia Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 24; 260 FLR 37 WorkCover Queensland v Amaca Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 420; [2010] HCA 34 WorkCover Queensland v Seltsam Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 518; [2001] NSWCA 457 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Northern Sydney Local Health District (First Appellant) Hunter and New England Local Health District (Second Appellant) Amaca Pty Ltd (First Respondent) WorkCover Queensland (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Miller SC with M J Smith (Appellants) J Sheller (First Respondent) R Cavanagh SC (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate