NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Capar v SPG Investments Pty Limited t/a Lidcombe Power Centre (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1373 Hearing dates: 29 September 2017 Date of orders: 29 September 2017 Decision date: 29 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [12] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to administer interrogatories – Whether to exercise discretion to dispense with operation of rule – Whether special reasons to justify order – Confusion as to identity of person in tendered documents – Application refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Capar v SPG Investments Pty Limited t/a Lidcombe Power Centre (No 1) [2017] NSWSC 1371 Capar v SPG Investments Pty Limited t/a Lidcombe Power Centre (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1372 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Gengiz Capar – Plaintiff SPG Investments Pty Limited t/a Lidcombe Power Centre – First defendant Business Protection Group Pty Limited – Second defendant / first cross-claimant The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer – Third defendant R.W. O'Brien and Associates Pty Ltd – Third cross-defendant Representation: Counsel: D R Campbell SC and JJ Ryan – Plaintiff D D Feller SC – First defendant R Cheney SC – Second defendant S A Flett – Third defendant N Polin SC – Third cross-defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate