NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Passmore v Maitland City Council [2017] NSWCA 253 Hearing dates: 4 October 2017 Date of orders: 04 October 2017 Decision date: 13 October 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; White JA at [8]; Sackville AJA at [38] Decision: (1) Grant the appellant leave to rely on the second amended notice of appeal filed in court; (2) Dismiss the appeal; (3) Order that the appellant pay the costs of the first and second respondents. Catchwords: TORTS — Negligence — Proof of negligence — primary judge not satisfied the appellant was injured as a result of the condition of the tennis court — no error in primary judge's accepting evidence of respondent's witnesses — no issue of principle raised
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Hearings — Adjournment — no error in primary judge's refusal to adjourn hearing
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Separate determination of questions — no error in primary judge's ordering that question of liability be determined separately and in advance of other issues Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Duncan McFarlane Cavendish Passmore (Appellant) Maitland City Council (1st Respondent) Maitland City Tennis Club Inc (2nd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C A W Hart (Appellant) G Jensen (1st Respondent) P Cummings SC (2nd Respondent)
Solicitors: Bale Boshev Lawyers (Appellant) Moray & Agnew (Newcastle) (1st Respondent) Colin Biggers & Paisley (2nd Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/368572 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: Not published on Caselaw Date of Decision: 11 November 2016 Before: Balla DCJ File Number(s): 2015/170841
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate