NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v TS [2017] NSWCCA 247 Hearing dates: 29 September 2017 Decision date: 13 October 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Latham J at [2] N Adams J at [40] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal – attempted sexual intercourse – attempted indecent assault – directed acquittal – direction made before conclusion of Crown case – no case submission – continuation of conduct that eventuates in an act Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Amalgamated Television Ltd v Marsden [2001] NSWCA 32; (2001) 122 A Crim R 166 Inegbedion v R [2013] NSWCCA 291 May v O'Sullivan (1955) 92 CLR 654 R v Barker [1924] NZLR 865 R v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 R v PL [2009] NSWCCA 256; 199 A Crim R 199 R v PL [2012] NSWCCA 31 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101; [1999] NSWCCA 377 R v White (1910) 2 KB 124 R v Williams, Ex parte The Minister for Justice and Attorney General (1965) Qld R 86 RMC v R [2013] NSWCCA 285 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) P/L (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 The Queen v N Ltd and C Ltd [2008] EWCA Crim 1223 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown/Appellant) TS (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Crown) I Bourke SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate