NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nitopi v Translawcom Pty Ltd t/as Brander Smith McKnight (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1421 Hearing dates: 13 June 2017 and written submissions 8 September 2017 and 15 September 2017 Date of orders: 20 October 2017 Decision date: 20 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: (1) The defendant pay Ms Nitopi's costs of the proceedings, except for the costs of the defendant's motion of 13 December 2016 and the hearing before Rothman J on 21 and 24 March 2017;
(2) Ms Nitopi is to bear the costs of the defendant's motion of 13 December 2016;
(3) Each party is to bear their own costs of the hearing on 21 and 24 March 2017. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – costs – costs orders where a party succeeded on some issues and failed on others – exceptions from the general rule as to costs Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Nitopi v Translawcom Pty Ltd t/as Brander Smith McKnight [2017] NSWSC 1156 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex Parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Turkmani v Visvalingam (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 279 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Cristina Francesca Pirrello Nitopi (Plaintiff) Translawcom Pty Ltd t/as Brander Smith McKnight (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Djurdjevic (Plaintiff) Mr M Maconachie (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate