NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coshott v Barry & Board [2017] NSWSC 1435 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 20 October 2017 Decision date: 20 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: The applicant is to pay the first and second respondents' costs, assessed as a gross sum on the indemnity basis, in the amount of $30,223.30. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – no reasonably arguable case – gross sum assessment – desirability of preventing further satellite litigation concerning costs and costs assessment Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bookarelli Pty Ltd v Katanga Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 94 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403; [1994] HCA 14 Coshott v Barry [2017] NSWSC 1220 Coshott v Spencer [2017] NSWCA 118 Hancock v Rinehart (Lump sum costs) [2015] NSWSC 1640 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Lawrence v Nikolaidis (2003) 57 NSWLR 355; [2003] NSWCA 129 Category: Costs Parties: Ljiljana Coshott (applicant) Stephen Michael Barry (first respondent) Martin Pearce Board (second respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Oliver Jones (applicant) Ms Michelle Castle (first and second respondents)
Solicitors: Mr John Comino, Comino Prassas Solicitors (applicant) Mr Stephen Barry, CKB Partners (first and second respondents) File Number(s): 2016/239683
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate