NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Tolputt [2017] NSWDC 285 Hearing dates: 1 September 2017 Date of orders: 01 September 2017 Decision date: 01 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: KEARNS DCJ Decision: The defendant is convicted and fined the sum of $20,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor. The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs as may be agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – work health and safety – worker's duty not to adversely affect the health and safety of other persons – defendant a self-employed tree climbing contractor – method prepared by BTS for removing tree that had fallen onto house – method not capable of implementation – defendant utilised another method without discussion with BTS – other workers on roof of house – exposure to risk of being struck by tree parts and risk of fall from roof – aggravating and mitigating factors – relief under Fines Act Legislation Cited: Work Health and Safety Act 2011; Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; Fines Act 1996 Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37 Texts Cited: Amenity Tree Industry Code of Practice – WorkCover, August 1998; Managing the Risk of Falls at Workplaces Code of Practice – Safe Work Australia, January 2012; Work Health and Safety Consultation, Co-operation and Co-ordination Code of Practice, WorkCover NSW, December 2011; National Code of Practice for the Prevention of Falls in Housing Construction - SafeWork Australia, April 2010 Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (prosecutor); Jeremi Scott Tolputt (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Docking appeared for the prosecutor; Ms K Conte-Mills appeared for the defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate