NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roberts v Department of Justice, Corrective Services NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 310 Hearing dates: 11 August 2017 Date of orders: 27 October 2017 Decision date: 27 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: 1. Leave is granted for the respondent to appear and be represented for the purpose of determining the applicant's application under s 4 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW). 2. Leave is granted under s 5 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) for the applicant to institute these proceedings. 3. Leave is granted under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) for the applicant's complaint to proceed. 4. The publication of paragraphs 30 to 36 of the Respondent's submissions dated 8 September 2017 is prohibited. This order is made under section 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – rights of 'felons' to institute civil proceedings – where applicant in custody has been convicted of a serious indictable offence – where applicant has required President of Anti-Discrimination Board to refer complaint of disability discrimination to the Tribunal – whether Tribunal is a court for the purposes of s 4 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) - whether applicant has instituted civil proceedings – whether the Tribunal is satisfied that the proceedings are not an abuse of process and that there is prima facie ground for the proceedings
PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – whether material not provided to President of the Anti-Discrimination Board should be taken into account when determining whether to grant leave under s 96 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate