NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ELD v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 466 Hearing dates: 8 November 2005 Decision date: 02 December 2005 Before: Sully J at 1; Hulme J at 98; Latham J at 118 Decision: In the first trial orders are: that the appeal against conviction be allowed; that the appellant's conviction and sentence be quashed; that there be a new trial.; In the second trial orders are by majority, (Hulme J dissenting): that the appeal against conviction be allowed; that the appellant's conviction and sentence be quashed; that there be entered in lieu a directed verdict of acquittal on Count 3 in the relevant indictment. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: The Queen v Carroll [2002] 213 CLR 635 Regina v Z [2002] 2 A.0 483 R v Degnan [2001] 1 NZLR 280 Garrett v The Queen [1997] 139 CLR 437 Pfennig v The Queen [1995] 182 CLR 461 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 M y The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Markuleski [2001] 52 NSWLR 82 M.F.A v The Queen [2002] 213 CLR 606 R v Vinh Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 Mackenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348 R v Kirkham (1987) 44 SASR 591 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ELD Regina Representation: Counsel: W. Roser - Crown S. Odgers SC - Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate