NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v CZD [2017] NSWCATOD 153 Hearing dates: 03 April 2017 Date of orders: 27 October 2017 Decision date: 27 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: M Craig QC, ADCJ, Principal Member David Fairlie, Senior Member Jane Schwager AO, General Member Decision: (1) Order that the Respondent be reprimanded.
(2) Order that the Respondent pay 50% of the Applicant's costs. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – disciplinary complaint – certifying copies of enduring power of attorney and enduring appointment of guardian as true copies of original documents – use of copies to obtain reports from medical practitioners and bank records relating to the appointor – intended to support application for appointment of guardian to the affairs of the appointor – no proper assessment of documents provided by client to determine that they were original documents – original documents held by other practitioners – unsatisfactory professional conduct – mitigating circumstances Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) (repeal) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allinson v General Counsel of Medical Education and Registration [1894] QBD 750 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v CZZ [2017] NSWCATOD 31 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Webb [2013] NSWCA 423 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Asuzu [2011] NSWADT 209 Donaghy v Council of the Law Society of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 32 Griffin v The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 364 Leon Nikolaidis v Legal Services Commissioner [2007] NSWCA 130 Pillai v Messiter (No.2) (1989) 16 NSWLR 197 Re Hodgekiss [1962] SR (NSW) 340 Xu v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 430; (2009) 236 FLR 480 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) CZD (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Tronson (Applicant) M Fordham SC and A Rose (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate