NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Jieying Sun [2017] NSWSC 1476 Hearing dates: 30 & 31 August 2017 Date of orders: 30 October 2017 Decision date: 30 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: (1) The application for exclusion orders is dismissed. (2) Ms Sun is to pay the Commissioner's costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – restrained funds – application to exclude property from restraint – monies transferred internationally – question of whether property is proceeds or instrument of a serious offence – question of whether property deemed to be proceeds or instrument of crime Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: AFP v Lordianto [2017] NSWSC 1196 AFP v Pham [2015] NSWSC 1383 AFP v Fernandez [2017] NSWSC 1197 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Kalimuthu [No 3] [2017] WASC 108 Director of Public Prosecutions (Victoria) v Le (2007) 232 CLR 562 Studman v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (2007) 177 A Crim R 34; [2007] NSWCA 285 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police – Applicant Jieying Sun – Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr G O'Mahoney – Applicant Mr P Reynolds – Respondent
Solicitors: Solicitor for AFP Proceeds of Crime Litigation Unit – Applicant Weighbridge Lawyers – Respondent File Number(s): 2015/308779 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate