NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Ten Network Holdings Limited (subject to a deed of company arrangement) (receivers and managers appointed) [2017] NSWSC 1480 Hearing dates: 16 October 2017 Decision date: 16 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The Court confirms the hearing date, reserving the ability to objecting shareholders to bring a further application for deferral of the hearing date. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Hearings – Application under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to transfer shares pursuant to deed of company arrangement – where objecting shareholders seek deferral of hearing to prepare objections – whether hearing should be deferred Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 444GA - Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B - Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW), r 2.13 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mark Korda, Jennifer Nettleton and Jarrod Villani as joint and several deed administrators of Ten Network Holdings Limited (subject to a deed of company arrangement) (receivers and managers appointed) and each of the companies listed in the Schedule (Plaintiffs) Y Du (Interested Person) (self-represented) D Gubbay (Interested Person) (self-represented) Representation: Counsel: C R C Newlinds SC (Plaintiffs)
Solicitors: Baker McKenzie (Plaintiffs) File Number(s): 2017/290027
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate