NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wan v R [2017] NSWCCA 261 Hearing dates: 15 September 2017 Date of orders: 08 November 2017 Decision date: 08 November 2017 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Beech-Jones J at [2]; Fagan J at [53] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence be granted.
(2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING – parity – applicant pleaded guilty to manufacture and supply large commercial quantity of prohibited drugs – co-offender pleaded guilty to importation of same drugs – applicant and co-offender received similar sentences even though applicant pleaded guilty at earlier stage – application of parity principle to offender charged with State offences and co-offender charged with Commonwealth offences – comparison of roles and position in hierarchy – no justifiable sense of grievance – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 606 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Saleh [2015] NSWCCA 299 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wai Man Wan (Applicant) The Queen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC (Applicant) L Crowley; G Wright (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate