NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McCarthy v Tye [2017] NSWCA 284 Hearing dates: 24 October 2017 Decision date: 06 November 2017 Before: Basten JA; Macfarlan JA; Sackville AJA Decision: 1. Extend the time for the filing of a notice of appeal until 6 December 2016.
2. Dismiss the appeal.
3. The appellant to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – appellant claimed to be de facto partner of the deceased – primary judge rejected claim but found appellant was an "eligible person" under s 57(1) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) as he had been in a "close personal relationship with the deceased" – primary Judge awarded the appellant $85,000 out of estate valued at about $900,000 – whether any error in primary Judge's findings of fact or evaluative judgments Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 21C Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), ss 4, 5, 44 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 59, 60 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2008] NSWCA 320 Durham v Durham (2011) 80 NSWLR 335; [2011] NSWCA 62 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 McCarthy v Tye [2015] NSWSC 1947 Pawlowska v Zajglic [2011] NSWCA 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Raymond McCarthy (Appellant) Geoffrey Norman Tye (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Appellant) Mr M K Meek SC / Mr A Djurdjevic (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate