NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd and Others; Pham v Sebie [2017] NSWSC 1509 Hearing dates: 8 September 2017 Date of orders: 08 November 2017 Decision date: 08 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: The first and third defendants should pay the plaintiffs costs of the plaintiffs' motion for contempt, on the indemnity basis. Such costs may be off-set against any moneys payable by the plaintiffs to the third defendant on the settlement of the 2014 Contract. Catchwords: COSTS - party/party – costs orders in interlocutory proceedings – motions resolved in substance by the course of events - plaintiffs and applicants on three motions unwilling to proceed – costs outcomes for two of the motions agreed - who should bear the costs of the remaining contempt motion – application of UCPR, r 42.7 - whether one or other party was certain to succeed on the contempt motion – whether one or other party conducted the contempt motion unreasonably. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 67, 98(4)(c) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 79 106B Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987, s 5(1) Real Property Act 1900, s 74J Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 7.36, 42.7, 51.44 Cases Cited: Angela Campbell Pty Ltd (as trustee of the Halina Superannuation Fund) v Hengrove Hall Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1219 Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Limited (1993) 44 FCR 194 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd v Pham [2017] NSWCA 236 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1 Lawrence v Gunner [2015] NSWCA 322 McIntyre v Perks (1988) 15 NSWLR 417 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: In proceedings 2015/325044: First plaintiff: Andy Vuong Duc Pham Second plaintiff: Thi Huong Giang Pham First defendant: Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd Second defendant: Nadine Musabwasoni Third defendant: Robert Sebie
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate