NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Hollaway (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1517 Hearing dates: 13 October 2017 Decision date: 07 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Extended supervision order for a period of three years with conditions Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – High risk violent offender – application for extended supervision order – whether unacceptable risk of committing a serious violence offence – history of violent offending – substance abuse and other risk factors recurring themes – history of parole breaches – compliant with interim supervision order – too soon to find risk diminished – substance use and mental health issues only partially treated – risk unacceptable – order made for three years Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 37(1) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57; 91 NSWLR 636 R v Hollaway [2013] NSWSC 218 R v Hollaway [2016] NSWCCA 166 State of New South Wales v Hollaway [2017] NSWSC 1000 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28; 249 A Crim R 65 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Karyna Amy Hollaway (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms G Wright (Plaintiff) Ms A Cook (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2017/169994
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate