NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sfeir & Associates Investments Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2017] NSWLEC 1626 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 24 October 2017 Date of orders: 06 November 2017 Decision date: 06 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sfeir & Associates Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant) Bayside Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr P Saab, Macquarie Lawyers (Applicant) Mr S Schneider, Houston Dearn O'Connor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/163714 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application: Plan Details Author Date Existing Conditions/Demolition Plan & Site Plan, Drawing No. 01, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Site Context Plan, Drawing No. 02, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Site Plan, Basement and Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 03, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Streetscape Elevation, Drawing No. 04, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Basement Level 2, Drawing No. 05, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Basement Level 1, Drawing No. 06, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 07, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 First Floor Plan, Drawing No. 08, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. 09, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Third Floor Plan, Drawing No. 10, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Roof Plan, Drawing No. 11, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Elevations, Drawing No. 12, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Elevations, Drawing No. 13, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Sections, Drawing No. 14, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Sections, Drawing No. 15, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Accessible Unit Floor Plan, Drawing No. 16, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 External Finishes Schedule, Drawing No. 17, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Window & Door Schedule, Drawing No. 18, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Sun Shadow Diagrams (June), Drawing No. 19, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Sun Shadow Diagrams (Sept), Drawing No. 20, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Cross Flow Ventilation, Drawing No. 21, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 GFA Calculation Plans, Drawing No. 22, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Perspective Views, Drawing No. 23, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Ramp Long Sections, Drawing No. 24, Issue E CAD3 25 October 2017 Landscape Intent, Drawing No. 1646-01, Issue B Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 25 October 2017 Ground Floor Landscape Plan, Drawing No. 1646-02, Issue C Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 25 October 2017 Basement Landscape Plan, Drawing No. 1646-03, Issue C Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 25 October 2017 Typical Cross Section Landscape, Drawing No. 1646-04, Issue A Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 21 March 2017 Proposed Plants, Drawing No. 1646-05, Issue B Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 25 October 2017 Proposed Plants, Drawing No. 1646-06, Issue A Jackie Amos Landscape Architect 25 October 2017 Stormwater Concept Plan Basement Level, Sheet 1 of 2, Drawing No. 101, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 Stormwater Concept Plan Basement Level, Sheet 2 of 2, Drawing No. 102, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 Stormwater Concept Plan Ground Level, Drawing No. 103, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 Catchment Plan, Drawing No. 104, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 OSD & WSUD Details, Sheet 1 of 2, Drawing No. 105, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 OSD & WSUD Details, Sheet 2 of 2, Drawing No. 106, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017 Miscellaneous Details, Drawing No. 107, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017 Australian Consulting Engineers 21 March 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate