NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited v Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1526 Hearing dates: 11 October 2017 Decision date: 09 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: The application is dismissed. Catchwords: COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION – International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) s 7(2) – CONTRACT – construction – application by first defendant for an order that it and the plaintiffs be referred to arbitration in California – whether the plaintiffs and the first defendant are parties to an arbitration agreement under which they have undertaken to submit to arbitration the dispute to be quelled by the proceedings – whether a provision of their Letter Agreement for the production of the motion picture Mad Max-Fury Road includes an arbitration provision as a consequence of the incorporation of standard terms for "A" list directors and producers – whether the arbitration clause in Certificates of Employment executed by the first plaintiff, the first defendant and two directors of the first plaintiff covers the present dispute – whether the law of California is to be applied – application by the second plaintiff for a stay of the proceedings on forum non conveniens grounds – HELD: not established that the plaintiffs and the first defendant agreed to arbitration by the Letter Agreement – HELD: the arbitration clause in the Certificates of Employment does not cover the dispute – questions of stay on other grounds do not arise. Legislation Cited: International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Cione v Foresters Equity Services Inc. 58 Cal. App. 4th 625 (1997) Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Comandate Marine Corporation v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd (2006)157 FCR 45 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov [2008] 1 Lloyd's Rep 254 Francis Travel Marketing Pty Ltd v Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 160 Hampton Court v Crooks (1957) 97 CLR 367 IBM Australia Ltd v National Distribution Services Pty Ltd (1999) 22 NSWLR 466 International Air Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 151 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104 Oceanic Sun Line Shipping Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Limited – First Plaintiff Kennedy Miller Mitchell Services Pty Limited – Second Plaintiff Warner Bros. Feature Productions Pty Limited – First Defendant Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. – Second Defendant Representation: Counsel: R.A. Dick SC with A.M. Hochroth - Plaintiffs A.S. Bell SC with S.J. Free - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate