NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miles v R [2017] NSWCCA 266 Hearing dates: 6 November 2017 Date of orders: 16 November 2017 Decision date: 16 November 2017 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Rothman J at [11]; Hamill J at [67] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted;
(2) Appeal be upheld;
(3) The sentence imposed on the Applicant, Benjamin Adam Miles, by the District Court on 10 June 2016, be quashed and in lieu thereof the following sentence be imposed:
(a) An aggregate sentence, being a sentence of a non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months commencing 27 August 2015 and expiring 26 May 2019 and a balance of term of 3 years and 3 months, concluding 26 August 2022.
(b) The Applicant is first eligible for parole on 26 May 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – conceded error in taking Form 1 offences into account on each charge instead of specifying the count – principles of parity discussed in re-sentencing – appeal allowed – sentence reduced. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barnden v State of Western Australia [2014] WASCA 161 Cameron v R [2017] NSWCCA 229 Doumit v R [2011] NSWCCA 134 DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Green v R; Quinn v R (2011) 244 CLR 463; [2011] HCA 49 Hi v The Queen [2017] VSCA 315 Hilli v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v McGuire [2017] QCA 250 R v Phuong; R v Lewan [2015] SASCFC 70 Sparos v R (2013) 235 A Crim R 462; [2013] NSWCCA 223 Street v Queensland Bar Association (1989) 168 CLR 461; [1989] HCA 53; Tan v R [2014] NSWCCA 96 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Wan v R [2017] NSWCCA 261 Woodward v R [2017] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Benjamin Adam Miles (Applicant) Regina (Respondent Crown) Representation: Counsel: P Skinner (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate