NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D.R. Design (NSW) Pty Limited v Grand City International Development Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1778 Hearing dates: 13 and 14 November 2017 Decision date: 19 December 2017 Before: Ball J Decision: See paragraphs [89] to [91] of this judgment Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Construction – Interpretation – Termination clause – How termination clause should be interpreted – Requirement that clause be given sensible and businesslike interpretation CONTRACTS – Formation – Variation – Whether work for which plaintiff claims can be properly characterised as variations CONTRACTS – Termination – Repudiation of contract – Wrongful termination – Whether defendant was entitled to terminate contract – Whether defendant's notice of termination constituted wrongful repudiation Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 69 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; [1973] HCA 36 Carr v JA Berriman Pty Ltd (1953) 89 CLR 327; [1953] HCA 31 Charter Reinsurance Co Ltd v Fagan [1997] AC 313 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 210 CLR 181; [2001] HCA 70 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Category: Principal judgment Parties: D.R. Design (NSW) Pty Limited t/as Dickson Rothschild (ACN 134 237 540) (Plaintiff) Grand City International Development Pty Ltd (ACN 601 060 600) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Weinberger (Plaintiff) Dr A Greinke (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate