NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Hanna [2017] NSWCATOD 165 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18 and 19 October 2017 Date of orders: 17 November 2017 Decision date: 17 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland ADCJ, Deputy President Dr J Spies, Professional Member Dr K Edwards, Professional Member C Gardiner, General Member Decision: 1.The Tribunal having found the practitioner guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct orders that: (a) the matter be listed for a Stage 2 hearing on 27 November 2017 at 10am. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – Where it is asserted medical practitioner is guilty of professional misconduct – where boundary violation with patient admitted by medical practitioner Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Clyne v NSW Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186; [1960] HCA 40 Fraser v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 421 Health Care Complaints Commission v Karalasingham [2007] NSWCA 267 Health Care Complaints Commission v Wingate (2007) 70 NSWLR 323 Lucire v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 99 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 CLR 445; [1992] HCA 66 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Ll.Rep 403 Texts Cited: Fact Finding made Easy (2006) 80 ALJ 454 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Dr Ibrahim Youssef Hanna (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Mathur (Applicant) P Griffin SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate