NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vargovic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 336 Hearing dates: 13 March 2017 and 14 July 2017 Date of orders: 17 November 2017 Decision date: 17 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision to revoke the applicant's Category AB firearms licence is set aside. Catchwords: FIREARMS ACT – firearms – revocation of licence – contrary to the public interest – psychological state of applicant – competing evidence Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Others (1995) ALR 657 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 50 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSWADT 28 Cook v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 30 Wiltshire v Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vladi Vargovic (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: In Person (Applicant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378340 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the respondent on a confidential basis, to the documents produced under summons by G Dale and marked "Confidential", to those paragraphs of these reasons identified as [Not for publication], to the evidence given in private before the Tribunal and to the record of that part of the proceedings conducted in private pursuant to s 49. That material is not to be released to either the applicant or to the public.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate