NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jin Huang v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1653 Hearing dates: 25 and 26 September, 2017 Date of orders: 21 November 2017 Decision date: 21 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed 2. Development Application DA295/2016 for a mixed use development at 1-3 Weyland Street, Punchbowl is refused. 3. The exhibits, except Exhibits A, B and 3, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: mixed use development; calculation of height; whether height exceedence; whether clause 4.6 variation required; setbacks and building separation; design quality of apartments; ceiling heights; solar access; natural ventilation; communal open space; streetscape character; area in transition; adequacy of onsite stormwater detention; adequacy of basement car park design having regard to AS2890.1; precedent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development Texts Cited: Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012 Apartment Design Guide 2015 Australian Standard AS2890.1:2004 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jin Huang (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms L-M Saw, barrister (Applicant) Ms S Puckeridge (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate