NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sheesha (NSW) Pty Ltd v Canterbury‑Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1658 Hearing dates: 30-31 October 2017 Date of orders: 21 November 2017 Decision date: 21 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans. (2) No order as to costs. (3) The appeal is dismissed. (4) Development application Da/592/2016 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a four storey hotel, commercial tenancy and basement car parking is refused. (5) The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibits 1, G and the Class 1 Application dated 9 March 2017. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL: Proposed hotel – practicality of proposed building height – streetscape presentation – pedestrian experience – street activation – variation to controls not warranted – siting of ground floor inappropriate in context – poor streetscape presentation. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2013] NSWLEC 1072 Arnott v City of Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1052 Trinvass Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 151 Weal v Bathurst City Council & Anor [2000] NSWCA 88 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; (2001) 115 LGERA 373; [2001] NSWCA 167 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sheesha (NSW) Pty Ltd (Applicant) Canterbury‑Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Duggan (Applicant) Mr A Seton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate