NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AP v R [2017] NSWCCA 270 Hearing dates: 2 August 2017 Date of orders: 24 November 2017 Decision date: 24 November 2017 Before: Johnson J at [1] Davies J at [2] Lonergan J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – sentencing – assessment of objective seriousness – where offence does not carry a standard non-parole period – whether sentencing Judge assessed objective seriousness – where sentencing Judge described the offences as "objectively serious matters" – where issue not taken at first instance – no error demonstrated – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61M, 66C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3, 5, 21A, 53A Cases Cited: Bland v R (2014) 241 A Crim R 51; [2014] NSWCCA 82 Charbaji v R [2011] NSWCCA 181 Delaney v R; R v Delaney (2013) 230 A Crim R 581; [2013] NSWCCA 150 Gal v R [2015] NSWCCA 242 Georgopolous v R [2010] NSWCCA 246 Harris v R [2015] NSWCCA 81 Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 R v Sivell [2009] NSWCCA 286 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 Sharma v R [2017] NSWCCA 85 Simpson v R [2014] NSWCCA 23 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AP (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Karim (Applicant) N J Adams (Crown Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate