NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D L Newport Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1661 Hearing dates: 30 November , 1 December 2016, 23, 24 February, 13 March 2017, 15 May 2017, 13 June 2017 (further submissions) Date of orders: 21 November 2017 Decision date: 21 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: The appeal is dismissed and the exhibits are returned Catchwords: MODIFICATION – of a development application to relocate the driveway and vehicular access into a higher hazard flood area – does the relocated driveway present an unacceptable risk to life - jurisdiction – does the owners' consent relied upon by the applicant satisfy the requirements of cl 115 (1) (h) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 – whether the development after modification is substantially the same as the original consent Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1979 Local Government Act 1993 Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure & Ors [2015] NSWLEC 12 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Liverpool Council [2009] NSWLEC 100 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 Mulyan Pty Ltd v Cowra Shire Council and Anor [1999] NSWLEC 212; (1999) 105 LGERA 26 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Scrap Realty Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2008] NSWLEC 333; (2008) 166 LGERA 342 Sydney City Council v Ilenace Pty Ltd [1984] 3 NSWLR 414 Sydney City Council v Ipoh Pty Ltd (2006) 68 NSWLR 411; 149 LGERA 329 Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [1992] NSWLEC 8 Texts Cited: Newport Commercial Centre Master Plan 2007 Pittwater Development Control Plan 2012 Pittwater Development Control Plan 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: D L Newport Pty Ltd (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Eastman (Applicant) Mr A Stafford (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate