NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v JT [2017] NSWCCA 272 Hearing dates: 27 September 2017 Decision date: 24 November 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Latham J at [2] N Adams J at [3] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) The stay ordered by the primary judge on 10 July 2017 be set aside. Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL – appeal by Crown pursuant to s 5F(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – where trial judge stayed indictment pending the provision of further particulars – whether trial judge erred in finding that the relevant counts suffered from latent ambiguity such that further particulars required Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2), 66A(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(2) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 130A, 306V Cases Cited: RG v R [2010] NSWCCA 173 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Yildiz v R [2006] NSWCCA 97 Texts Cited: LexisNexis Butterworths, Criminal Practice and Procedure NSW Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Appellant) JT (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Cinque SC (Appellant) Mr S Fraser (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) PJM Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00139794; 2016/00138470 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 10 July 2017 Before: Bennett SC DCJ File Number(s): 2016/00138470; 2016/00139794
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate