NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shoebridge v Department of Education [2017] NSWCATAD 343 Hearing dates: On the papers after 8 August 2017 Date of orders: 27 November 2017 Decision date: 27 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: (1) The reviewable decision is set aside.
(2) The Tribunal orders the information sought to be released to the Applicant. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to information – reviewable decisions – public interest considerations – personal information – legitimate business interests Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Department v Cockcroft [1986] FCA 35; (1986) 10 FCR 180 Battin v University of New England [2013] NSWADT 73 Public Service Assn v Premier's Department [2002] NSWADT 277 Flack v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2011] NSWADT 286 Hall v Department of Premier and Cabinet (NSW) [2012] NSWADT 46 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 198 Neary v State Rail Authority [1999] NSWADT 107 Roy v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 120 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Shoebridge (Applicant) Department of Education (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Shoebridge (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate