Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Ruo Shan Wu) [2017] NSWSC 1586 Hearing dates: 6 December 2016 Date of orders: 23 November 2017 Decision date: 23 November 2017 Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Summons dated 24 August 2016 dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – whether Proper Officer erred in refusing a referral to a review panel under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 63 – whether Proper Officer erred in finding that there was no error of a material respect concerning assessment "on the papers" for claimants outside Australia – held no error Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Insurance Australia Ltd t/a NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Authority [2017] NSWSC 1566 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Ltd t/a NRMA Insurance (P) State Insurance Regulatory Agency (D1) Ruo Shan Wu (D2) Representation: Counsel: J Gracie (P) Submitting Appearance (D1) D Campbell SC/T Moisidis (D2) Solicitors: Curwoods Lawyers (P) Crown Solicitor's Office (D1) Slater & Gordon (D2) File Number(s): 2016/254577 Publication restriction: Not Applicable Judgments 1. On 24 August 2016, the plaintiff, Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance, brought proceedings by way of Summons against the first defendant, the State Insurance Regulatory Authority, and the second defendant, Mrs Ruo Shan Wu. 2. These proceedings were brought at the same time as, and were in substance the same as, those proceedings brought against other members of the second defendant's family - Mr Kun Fen Chen, her husband, and Ms Yan Fei Chen, their daughter. 3. The legal issues and submissions in each of the three proceedings were the same. 4. I have today delivered judgment in the proceedings involving the second defendant's husband: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Agency [2017] NSWSC 1566. 5. Because of the identity of issues, it follows that for the same reasons which I have there expressed, I would also dismiss these proceedings. Orders 1. I make the following orders: 1. Summons dated 24 August 2016 dismissed. 2. Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 24 November 2017