NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jacobsen v Jacobsen [2017] NSWSC 1590 Hearing dates: 9 November 2017 Decision date: 22 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: (1) Dismiss the plaintiff's application for leave to amend the statement of claim. (2) Refuse leave to re-plead. (3) Dismiss the proceedings with costs. (4) Dismiss the respective motions as to service with no order as to costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Applications for summary dismissal pursuant to r 13.4 and/or to strike out parts of the pleadings pursuant to r 14.28 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – Whether leave to replead should be granted
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Service – Application for substituted service pursuant to r 10.14 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 58 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-59 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 436A, 477(2B), 601AD(1A) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), s 71 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 1.12 6.2(4), 10.14, 12.4, 12.11, 13.4, 14.28, Pt 11A Cases Cited: Anderson v McPherson [No 2] [2012] WASC 19 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 134 Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71; [1996] HCA 57 Danich Pty Ltd; Re Cenco Holdings Pty Ltd (2005) 53 ACSR 484; [2005] NSWSC 293 Davies v Beyond Building Systems Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1489 Dover v Lewkovitz [2013] NSWCA 452 Fistar v Riverwood Legion and Community Club Ltd (2016) 91 NSWLR 732; [2016] NSWCA 81 Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Gate Gourmet AG [2002] NSWSC 727 Hancock Family Memorial Foundation Ltd v Porteous (2000) 22 WAR 198; [2000] WASCA 29 Hastie Group Ltd (In Liq) v Bourne [2017] NSWSC 709 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392; [2013] HCA 25 Mcintosh v Maitland [2016] QSC 203 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Nadinic v Drinkwater [2017] NSWCA 114 National Mutual Property Services (Australia) Pty Ltd v Citibank Savings Ltd (1995) 132 ALR 514 Poulton v Commonwealth (1953) 89 CLR 540 Re Diplock [1948] Ch 465 Ricegrowers Co-op Ltd v ABC Containerline NV (1996) 138 ALR 480; [1996] FCA 1663 Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd (2004) 220 ALR 267; [2004] NSWSC 1041 Shalson v Russo [2005] Ch 281 Shepherd v Doolan [2005] NSWSC 42 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315; [2003] HCA 57, Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse [1982] AC 679 United Dominions Corporation Ltd v Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1 [1985] HCA 49 UTSA Pty Ltd (in liq) v Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd [1997] 1 VR 667 Watiwat v Dixon [2017] NSWSC 360 Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd (2012) 88 ACSR 80; [2012] NSWCA 79 Yeshiva Properties v Marshall (2005) 219 ALR 112; [2005] NSWCA 23 Texts Cited: M Conaglen, Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties (2010, Hart Publishing) M Davies, A Bell, P Brereton, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia (9th ed, 2013, LexisNexis) J Edelman, "When do Fiduciary Duties Arise" (2010) 126 LQR 302 JD Heydon, MJ Leeming, Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed) JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (LexisNexis, 5th ed, 2015) PD Finn, "Fiduciary Reflections" (2014) 88 ALJ 127 E Sykes, "The Doctrine of Constructive Trusts" (1941) 15 Australian Law Journal 171 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Kevin Jacobsen (Plaintiff) Colin Jacobsen (First Defendant) Amber Jacobsen (Second Defendant) Dalys Jacobsen (Third Defendant) Clayton Jacobsen (Fourth Defendant) Zoulos Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Barry QC with J Rowe and J Darvall (Plaintiff) R Scruby SC with P Sharp (First and Fifth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate