NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tartak by her tutor Tartak v Zada [2017] NSWDC 330 Hearing dates: 12 October 2017 Date of orders: 12 October 2017 Decision date: 12 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Pursuant to ss 75-77 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), approve the settlement set out in the Consent Order filed in court today and make orders as follows: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff for the sum in paragraph 1. (2) Each party pay her or its own costs of these proceedings, save that the defendant will pay the report fees of Dr Akkerman and Dr Hampshire. (3) Note the undertaking of Mr Naushad Husaini, the current solicitor for the plaintiff, not to make any application to the NSW Trustee & Guardian for legal costs and that if any application is made in relation to the costs of the previous solicitor, Thomas Booler Lawyers (per Mr Marcel Joukhador), the parties are to have liberty to seek a personal costs order against those solicitors pursuant to s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW). (4) Note the provisions of paragraphs 3-6. (5) The net sum remaining after the deductions referred to in paragraph 2, namely the sum in paragraph 4, is to be paid direct to the NSW Trustee & Guardian for investment until the plaintiff's 18th birthday. (6) Having regard to the manner in which the report of Dr Akkerman has failed to diagnose the plaintiff's condition in a manner consistent with the Code of Conduct, refer Dr Akkerman's report to the Health Care Complaints Commission. Catchwords: TORT – personal injury – minor brings action for damages for psychiatric injury – unsatisfactory medical evidence and delay by solicitor – whether settlement of the claim should be approved under ss 75 – 77 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – settlement approved Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 75-77 Cases Cited: Rafidi v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2017] NSWCA 96 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Charlize Tartak by her tutor Milia Tartak Defendant: Sayed Murtaza Hassan Zada Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr J de Greenlaw Defendant: Ms J Gumbert
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate