NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hang v Nguy [2017] NSWDC 333 Hearing dates: 16 November 2017 Date of orders: 23 November 2017 Decision date: 23 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Defendants' application to withdraw admissions of "so much of their defence as may constitute an admission to the publication of the portion of the first matter complained of that is in the Chinese language" is dismissed. (2) Defendants pay the plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis. (3) Plaintiff's application for a gross sum costs order to be assessable forthwith refused. (4) Liberty to the parties to bring in Short Minutes of Order for a timetable for the future conduct of these proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by 18 defendants to withdraw admissions in their verified defence – 6 defendants provide no evidence – unsatisfactory explanations by the remaining 12 defendants – no notice of withdrawal, contrary to UCPR r 12.6(3) – case management factors - application to withdraw admissions refused – COSTS – application for indemnity costs payable forthwith – application for indemnity costs granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-62 and 98 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26, 30 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 12.6 Cases Cited: Blake-Dyke v Bayard [2017] NSWSC 1474 Hamod v New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659 Karadaghian v Big Beat (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 496 Maile v Rafiq [2005] NSWCA 41 Palace Films Pty Ltd v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 962 Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Phu Tho Hang First Defendant: David Nguy Second Defendant: Minh Mai Lam Third Defendant: Lai Van Tran Fourth Defendant: Wai Leung Fong Fifth Defendant: Michael Chen Sixth Defendant: Trung Hong Seventh Defendant: Minh Phu Eighth Defendant: Quang Thanh Dang Ninth Defendant: Sung Boy Heng Tenth Defendant: Fom Sau Tan Eleventh Defendant: Thu Xiem Tran Twelve Defendant: Huynh Tran Thirteenth Defendant: Kien Tran Fourteenth Defendant: Winnie Hoang Fifteenth Defendant: Minh Le Lam Sixteenth Defendant: Anna Nguy Seventeenth Defendant: Belinda Lam Eighteenth Defendant: Ly Van (Vicky) Hong Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Ms G Rubagotti Defendants: Mr C J Dibb
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate