NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of GTH Equipment Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1617 Hearing dates: 13 November 2017 Decision date: 24 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The creditor's statutory demand dated 4 August 2017 issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff be set aside and the Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Winding up — Statutory demand — Application to set aside – where application seeks to set aside demand for some other reason – where demand said to be for a judgment debt and not verified by affidavit – where demand claims post-judgment interest – whether post-judgment interest "judgment debt" – effect of lack of verification of demand. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 101 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Pt 5.4, ss 459E, 459G, 459J - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: - Agusta Pty Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd [2011] NSWSC 807 - Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd v CASC Hire Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1424; (2005) 147 FCR 379 - B & M Quality Constructions Pty Ltd v Buyrite Steel Supplies Pty Ltd (1994) 15 ACSR 433 - Body Corporate Repairers Pty Ltd v Oakley Thompson & Co Pty Ltd [2017] VSC 435 - Diploma Construction (WA) Pty Ltd v KPA Architects Pty Ltd [2014] WASCA 91 - Eumina Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corp [1998] FCA 824; (1998) 84 FCR 454 - Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd v Dubow [2011] NSWSC 531; (2011) 84 ACSR 296 - Four Seasons Construction Pty Ltd v Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council [2000] WASC 277; (2000) 35 ACSR 716 - Jargon Pty Ltd v Good Earth Garden Products Pty Ltd [2006] WASC 282; (2006) 206 FLR 244 - Kisimul Holdings Pty Ltd v Clear Position Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 262 - Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 24; (2005) 53 ACSR 229 - Pearl Bay Corp Pty Ltd v Lodur Pty Ltd [2000] WASC 315; (2001) 19 ACLC 982 - Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd [1996] NSWSC 199; (1996) 20 ACSR 746 - Timberland Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 466 - Wildtown Holdings Pty Ltd v Rural Traders Co Ltd [2002] WASCA 196; (2002) 172 FLR 35 Texts Cited: - F Assaf, Statutory Demands and Winding Up in Insolvency (2nd ed, 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: GTH Equipment Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Merlo Group Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J T Johnson (Plaintiff) P Afshar (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate